Comments on: Zero Energy Homes in California Could be Mandatory by 2020

By: Otto

Otto — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:51:58 +0000

whoever in goverment that votes for a home like this must have to build one for them to live in. they will not want to be called a hipacrate.

By: Otto

Otto — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:48:29 +0000

Zero energy house sounds great. No electricty lines. no sewer internal compost of human deposit. no water lines get water from roof when rains.. go to laundery mat will let you cheat. No cable or mictowaves. dont need to wire. out house close to house. will this work in northern califoria?
0 might not work to well. but 60% might be achiveable.

By: roslin@net zero energy building

roslin@net zero energy building — Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:42:19 +0000

I think that it would be great for the environment. Of course, there are many obstacles, such as how to foot the initial expenses, that will have to be considered and worked out to have a viable bill. I do think that more of the private sector is already taking the initiative on their own to build green, which is a great trend to see.

By: chicago nissan dealership

chicago nissan dealership — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:06:46 +0000

Now a days we should go for alternate energy resources for fuels otherwise there should be a scare of it.

By: Mel@Pelican Bay real estate

Mel@Pelican Bay real estate — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:07:17 +0000

Terrific, I think many people are voluntarily taking this route although not entirely taking their electricity bills to zero but still doing it to save their costs and also help the environment. I think that’s a fantastic idea if each and every house starts to power themselves up, I am sure the costs will come down and there will be ways for everyone to afford the system.

By: Ruby Fortune

Ruby Fortune — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:19:26 +0000

That goal will be hard to achieve in such a relatively short period but there are other places in Europe where many new houses are built in the "passive" style.

By: TaxForum

TaxForum — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:35:36 +0000

It's a lofty goal which CA residents will surely voted against once they realize that all this bill does is jack up the new home prices. Forget about government rebates. CA is broker and so is the fed. More rebates simply means higher taxes. TaxForums last blog post.."Caring for Our Parents": My New Book on Long-Term Care

By: Thomas

Thomas — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:25:00 +0000

It is really interesting to see from outside the US that suddenly Saving Energy becomes a topic in the States as well. Thomass last blog post..5 Online Crash Courses For New Web Product Managers

By: Mike Taylor@Indianapolis Real Estate

Mike Taylor@Indianapolis Real Estate — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:42:33 +0000

I don’t if the government needs to get involved or the free market can figure it out by themselves, I just know building green homes is a good thing. We always hear about how much cars contribute to global warming etc., but the housing sector accounts for an astounding percentage of the problem and gets way less attention.

By: Marcin@Go Get It

Marcin@Go Get It — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:00:15 +0000

I can’t see it to work without state or federal rebates, it will be to expensive for average person. But if they give some sort of rebates it will be great for the enviroment.